« Feed Enhancements: Added FeedFlare action items and FeedBlitz email subscription | Main | IT Linchpin 2006: The (Business-Driven) Enterprise Architect »

December 28, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2a6553ef00d8345bc5f569e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Patty Seybold’s New Book: Outside Innovation – A Call for Participation :

» Open Souce Analysis: A Q&A via James McGovern from tecosystems
Of all of the Fortune 500 enterprise architects out there, The Hartford's James McGovern is hands down my favorite. Not, as might be suspected, because he's been kind enough to mention RedMonk on a regular basis.[1] James and I appreciate... [Read More]

» Open Source Analysis: A Q&A via James McGovern from tecosystems
Of all of the Fortune 500 enterprise architects out there, The Hartford's James McGovern is hands down my favorite. Not, as might be suspected, because he's been kind enough to mention RedMonk on a regular basis.[1] James and I appreciate... [Read More]

Comments

Several days ago, I attempted to post our own innovative efforts but got an interesting programming error after submission :-(

As far as answers to your question:

1. Liferay and ServiceMix. Role has been ensuring extreme scalability to 384 CPUs and being a mouthpiece for community projects. Gained knowledge in the practice of community formation and expanded horizon along with provided alternatives for enterprise.

3. Liferay has the absolute best story around customer-led innovation. No other project has a story around 100% open source for life. No other project supports valuable charities. No other project stands for traditional values. More than just code, both a political and social statement.

4. You really shouldn't have asked this question. The answer is somewhat obvious to those in the community. The answer lies in the simple fact that it is being misrepresented by both the media and the analyst community. They talk about open source products but not open source as an agile methodology nor encourage corporations that sustainability requires both giving and receiving.

5. Really would love for PSGroup to do a report on corporations whose business isn't technology and how they can contribute to open source along with case studies of those already doing it...

James- Thanks for your answers. Re: #5, do you think there is a good "customer-led" innovation story, from an open source project that was incubated in an enterprise (non-technology business)? I might be stretching here...trying to get good ideas (case studies) for Patty's book, and cover your research suggestion. Let me know... -brenda

oh-on the PSG website error, Ray (our web guy) is on it. thanks for the heads-up.

Brenda,
#2-We have used JBoss, Apache and Linux in variety of roles within my company. JBoss primarily as prototype container for proof of concepts type projects with app servers. Its been very helpful because it is lightweight when compared to BEA and webSphere. Apache and Linux are more mainstream within the company. I also use Axis for doing interoperability testing with web services. Axis is embedded in a lot of software so its good to have around for testing.

I can also tell you had Sun/SeeBeyond been available in its current open source format, I would have look very hard at it from an EAI proof of concept. EAI vendors have very high costs. Lowering the entry level barrier is a big deal, especially during the proof of concept phase.

#4- I think this has been a good thing for open source. It certainly would not be enjoying the success it is enjoying if it were not for the ability to make money. Open source would still be around but with much less impact to the software world. The surge of startups centered on open source is just fueling the fire. And lets not forget the big vendors. Sun in particular. Sun's opening of Solaris 10 followed by the rest of its software product line will continue to have an impact on the other traditional vendors (I think).

#5-One thing I hear a lot when big vendors or just staff members in general speak of open source is the support question. Other than the obvious which is you can buy support contracts for all the commercial variations of open source products out there, open source support tends to be just as good if not better than what you pay for in support contracts. Open source developers tend to be pretty responsive and not walled off from the world. Traditional software support requires a lot of layers between the customer and the developer. The end result is rarely what you pay for.

markg
http://darth.homelinux.net

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEW BLOG LOCATION

Ads

License


  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.