« August 2005 | Main | October 2005 »
This week I wrote a BPEL Primer for the PSGroup research service. The Primer answers 4 questions:
In thinking about how to excerpt the report for my blog, I ended up creating a new illustration that shows the whole “A BPEL process is a service orchestration, used to describe/execute a business process (or large grained service), which is implemented as a stateful service” thing. In addition, the picture covers the “A process is comprised of steps, steps have activities AND activities are BPEL language elements, and the basic activity elements are the ones used to interact with the collaborating services <partnerLinks>” thing.
I wish I thought of it earlier, when I was working on the report. But, that goes to show the real-life nature (and power) of the blog…iteration!
If you want the full report, you can get it for free here. Before bailing for the free report, take a look at the new illustration; it ties into the “What is BPEL” section on page 4 of the PDF.
The BPEL Primer
Excerpt: What is BPEL, What is it Good For, How does it Work?
Note: The service terminology is consistent with my SOA definitions post.
What is a Business Process? A business process is a flow of work, broken out as a series of steps, or activities, which are required to complete a business transaction. The business process activities may require application and/or human behavior for completion. A business process is typically long-running in nature, involving multiple parties and/or applications within an enterprise or across enterprises.
What is a Business Process in BPEL? In BPEL, a business process is a large-grained stateful service, which executes steps to complete a business goal. That goal can be the completion of a business transaction, or fulfilling the job of a service. The steps in the BPEL process execute activities (represented by BPEL language elements) to accomplish work. Those activities are centered on invoking partner services to perform tasks (their job) and return results back to the process. The aggregate work, the collaboration of all the services, is a service orchestration.
As you can see, BPEL focuses on a very specific (but important) problem: the orchestration of services, into large-grained services and/or processes. The delineation of large-grained service versus process is based on the specific job being performed. That said, let’s go deeper.
[click ON Picture to enlarge]
What is BPEL?
BPEL, also known as BPEL4WS and WSBPEL, is an XML-based
language, built on top of Web Services specifications, which is used to define
and manage long-lived service orchestrations or processes. Let’s decompose that
in reverse. Orchestrations first, followed by the technical base.
When you use BPEL for orchestration, the primary service is a BPEL process, because BPEL processes are implemented as services.
The BPEL process controls the overall sequence and invokes the collaborating services.
To perform the orchestration, the BPEL process contains the logic (sequence, activities, invocations, assignments, and case logic) to invoke other services (collaborators), to complete their combined job.
This BPEL process may be asynchronous or synchronous. In an asynchronous model, the BPEL process is managing a long-lived flow of work; in other words, a process.
In a synchronous mode, the BPEL process is more likely playing the (logical) role of another service type, such as request/reply, worker, agent, or monitor.
Technology Base. BPEL’s technology underpinnings are XML and Web Services. XML, as most people know, is a standard (tags-based) markup language used in document and message definition and processing. In addition, XML serves as the language base (format and syntax) for many special purpose languages such as WSDL (Web Services Description Language), and RSS (Really Simple Syndication).
BPEL follows this same model. The BPEL process description is encoded using XML language constructs. BPEL also incorporates XPATH to write expressions and queries.
Web Services Specifications. Web Services are important to BPEL in two ways. First, BPEL processes follow the WSDL service model—which is why BPEL processes are implemented as services. More specifically, BPEL processes have a WSDL definition, and are implemented as Web Services (WSDL, SOAP, UDDI).
Along with the basic functions of service definition, discovery and invocation, the Web Service implementation allows BPEL execution engines to leverage additional Web Services standards at runtime, such as WS-Addressing and WS-Coordination.
Second, the collaborating services are also Web Services,
described in WSDL. So, BPEL processes and collaborators are Web Services, and
BPEL execution engines contain (and use) Web Services
runtime components. (Natively, the collaborating services (and the process service) are Web Services. However, BPELJ, an extension of BPEL, allows for a mix of Java Services and Web Services.
What Is BPEL Good
For?
So far, this has been fairly technical, talking service orchestration, business process services, interaction models and technology bases. Before going much deeper, it is important to understand the best uses (and limitations) of BPEL.
BPEL and Service Orchestration. BPEL offers a nice model to abstract orchestration logic from the participating services, and configuration using BPEL over (hard core) coding of service interactions is enticing. However, there is processing overhead and infrastructure expense, so BPEL might not be the best choice for simple orchestrations. As a rule of thumb, a simple orchestration is comprised of two to five services and has static interaction patterns.
BPEL AND PROCESSES. As a language to develop processes, BPEL is good at executing a series of activities, which occur over time, and interact with internal and external services. These processes may represent IT scenarios, such as integration, or business scenarios, such as information exchange, or flows of work.
As for limitations, BPEL does not account for humans in a process, so BPEL doesn’t provide workflow—there are no concepts for roles, tasks and inboxes. In addition, BPEL does not support really complex business processes, those which evolve during their execution, branching out to incorporate new parties and activities. Lastly, BPEL does not have native support for business activity monitoring (BAM). There isn’t a data model for measurement and monitoring.
Of course, for every limitation there are industrious groups trying to resolve it. In late August 2005, IBM and SAP AG proposed an extension to BPEL (BPEL4People), to incorporate humans (initiators, approvers, managers, and task doers) in BPEL processes. This is an important issue to resolve, and I’ll be watching the BPEL4People proposal closely.
How Does BPEL Work?
[In this excerpt, I only cover the BPEL environment. In the report, I also speak to the Design to Execution Procedure]
[click ON Picture to enlarge]
BPEL Design, Development, and Deployment. At the far left of the diagram is the BPEL design, development, and deployment environment. Here are the tools for business analysts and developers/integrations to describe processes (orchestrations), as a series of steps (activities), associate services, and add any special business or validation logic to the process flow.
These tools vary from plug-ins for drawing tools or integrated development environments, to full-blown standalone environments. Most tools support a toggle between the graphical design view and the BPEL source code view. Changes made in one mode should be reflected in the other.
Supporting the design and development tools should be your service repository.
BPEL Execution. In the center of the diagram is the BPEL execution environment. The BPEL Server contains the executing process instances, a Web Services framework, and the BPEL execution services. The BPEL execution engine services collectively provide the process lifecycle requirements (instantiation, communication, dehydration/hydration, correlation, transaction management, compensation, and termination) as spelled out in the specification. Similar to J2EE containers, the engine implementations need to meet the specification requirements, but how that is accomplished is up to the individual BPEL engine providers.
To the right of the BPEL server, I show the Process DB used to hold information on process instances and state, and the BPEL server’s management console.
I drew the BPEL server simply, in alignment with the specification; however, implementations vary, with vendors adding features for non-Web Service invocations, and business performance reporting. As with any technology, be sure you ascertain which functions are provided as part of the specification, and what are vendor-supplied (proprietary) extensions.
Underneath the BPEL server, I show four different host environment options: J2EE container, .Net container, Java Business Integration (JBI) container, and an enterprise service bus. Example (not endorsements) implementations for each host environment (respectively) are: Oracle’s BPEL Process Manager, Microsoft’s BizTalk Server, FiveSight Technologies’ PXE, and CapeClear’s ESB.
Above the BPEL server, I show the client service that initiates the process, and the collaborating (partner) services.
Bridge To Execution. The hand-off from development to execution contains the BPEL process definition, the WSDL of the BPEL process, and all engine-specific deployment files.
</excerpt>
For more on BPEL, check out the OASIS cover page, play a little – I started with this, or read my full report :)
